Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : INTERNET STOCKS WITH MOST POTENTIAL UNDER $5.00! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neal R. Bruckman who wrote (214)	3/11/1999 5:21:00 PM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 222

Howdy...! LGOV has a power-partner, called Sentio, that has developed the software that the Government of China is going to require ISP's over there to run. It's basically a very efficient filter - that prevents people from sucking porn, etc., from the WWW. I'm sure the sleazoids in Hollyweird will be aghast over that - but I'm afraid they're not going to garner any sympathy from me..! China is not a democracy (yet), so - if they want a "filter" they'll get a filter; and LGOV will deliver it. Buying LGOV right now ($0.105/share)provides a lot of leverage - in advance of the upcoming shareholder's meeting and expected substantial news. "Largo Vista (LGOV) Pure Chinese Play for 98' and beyond" is probably the most informative thread on the subject. The website (which should be completely overhauled soon) is located at: largovista.com You'll have to excuse some of the Jerry Springer-type drop-outs that will be hanging around until LGOV takes off (..and leaves them whining in the rain); but once onboard - you're going to enjoy yourself. Hey, you're invited......! John :-)

To: Neal R. Bruckman who wrote (214)	3/11/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: David	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222

Let me make sure I understand this BIOJ report you are offering: (1) It touts a nonreporting company that has no revenues; (2) It promotes a company that has no actual product (only "technology"); and, (3) Best of all, you are providing a "research report" funded by that same company. In other words, it looks objective, but it is a vanity publication with no more inherent credibility than an advertisement. Yeah, why should anyone invest in a biometric competitor that actually gets revenues from products when your client is around?