To: DrD who wrote (6153 ) 3/10/1999 9:12:00 PM From: Ed Perry Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17679
Your well done research proves a point. As we are all aware, Ampex is neither a PR company nor an end user company but primarily an engineering and equipment concern. Translated, this means we have to do own research. The company excels in its area of applied research and has enjoyed close in sales as a supply chain provider of technology and equipment. Then it stops there. Although it can be frustrating to an investing public, these very quiet relationships between top companies is a fairly common way of doing business. I can think of a number of strategic benefits for doing business quietly - being able to sell the same advanced equipment solutions to direct competitors is one. This brings me to another point. As I have been ranting and raving on about Convergence themes, I have touched upon forces in the businesses of: telephony and communications, Net Portals, entertainment content and equipment, broadcasting media companies, cable and wireless, computers, peripherals and networking, narrowcasting and streaming, set top box design and engineering, capital funding but never have these discussions, press clippings and linked articles addressed the obvious requirement of the massive on-demand storage which these ambitions will require. Instead, storage is always discussed in other focused topics in terms of larger, faster platters, fibre channel access, optical devices, an emerging SANS market of general computing and so on. Never once have these Convergence articles referred to the storage requirement and configuration needed to support VOD and high interactivity data streaming. In sum there is a lot of talk around the digital video storage issue but none that deals directly with it. Is this lack of discussion about storage and back end delivery among these giant contenders and partnerships an oversight? Does it point out a weak link in the proposal that translates into many years off for effective delivery of promised services? Thinking wishfully, I don't think so. In fact the absence of the specific discussion about this topic may mean only one thing. I dare not mention it here for fear that the Specialist may take the stock down another 1/2 point. What's your conclusions? Ed Perry