SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clarksterh who wrote (24017)3/11/1999 2:41:00 AM
From: Bux  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
I agree that the discussion on this thread indicates any agreement with ERICY is a good thing. I think that is because the Q's management is well respected. I can't imagine them agreeing to anything not in the shareholders best interest. They will do what they have to in order to maximize value.



To: Clarksterh who wrote (24017)3/11/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: Ramsey Su  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Clark,

what I don't understand about this backward compatible issue is the lack of protest from those who would be hurt the most. Sprint is the biggest that came to mind. Wouldn't they have to reinvent the wheel completely and dump all infrastructure? Shouldn't they be leading the screaming instead of QC?

Ramsey


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News