Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (15459)	3/10/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: mph	Respond to of 34811

TD: I guess this means you don't consider me a sane investor.<g> Thanks for the free license, though. Very piffy of you! mph

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (15459)	3/11/1999 2:50:00 AM
From: Dennis J.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34811

ACVC. As I was speeding along with the top down on my BM (as in BrowseMaster), I suddenly noticed I had passed a post with my name in it. Backing up, there it was. Jorj was trying another TDT, and warning that it was unsafe for even me. Well, that calls for a look see. Only ACVC doesn't download with my 3500 other stocks. That alone almost qualifies for a TDT, a true no-name stock. Persisting on, I downloaded and found Active Voice. This stock seems to have acted normally for the most part since its IPO in 1997, trading in a 10-15 range into early 1998, succumbing to the ugly market in Aug-Oct last,and bottoming at 4 3/8 on Oct 8. After a quick 70+% pop to 7+, it traded in the 6-8 range the rest of the year. 1999 saw a TT breakout at 8.5, and a run to 11, where it based again in the 8-11 range. Now a DT break at 11, and another pending at 11.5 as it tries to march higher. Jorj, this looks like a pick! I mean, other than a micro-cap, its pnf chart is decent. Isn't a TDT supposed to have a fatal flaw somewhere? But where is it? Please clue us in. Why is ACVC qualified as a TDT? Dennis