SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel W. Koehler who wrote (2111)3/11/1999 1:03:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 13060
 
Not a Hobbesian sovereign, but democratic discussion and the interplay of interests. By the way, if it were not for the government, there would probably be no Internet, and certainly the present one exists only due to government research.
One doesn't have to think ill of the citizenry, or even particularly well of government, to think that there should be mechanisms to represent community interests, and to adjudicate competing interests. That is why I have fixated on zoning. It is meant to take into account potentially deleterious third- party effects before harm has been done, or to provide efficient remedies in the event of an offense. Yet it proceeds through hearings, petitions, and the like, so that all interests have the chance to be represented.



To: Daniel W. Koehler who wrote (2111)3/16/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13060
 
>>"common good"<<

There is no such thing. Tyrants use "common good" as an excuse for their actions.

FWIW
Andy