Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumell who wrote (1389)	3/11/1999 12:00:00 PM
From: Glenn J. Mullan	Respond to of 5821

Mag-high's yes, at least for the most part, but not necessarily circular ("bulls-eyes"). Some are oblate, elliptical, etc. some are of slightly larger dimensions, and (mostly)within same geological domain near the gneissic margin with the Troilus belt to the north. It has been widely reported that some of the reconn. work in the area was by Monopros, while exploring various circular mag.-highs for kimberlite potential. As per norm, there is no public record of this work but that the claims were all allowed to lapse at the first renewal should tell us that none were considered promising (for diamonds) back in the early 90's. Most of these now expired claims, staked as square blocks back then, were actually still shown on the claim maps in the middle of January which made our job pretty easy. Regards, GJM