Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Leif V Singman who wrote (2920)	3/11/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 5390

Hi again Leif, I'm happy for you to make cracks about my thinking being influenced by being upside down with the resulting rush of blood to the head causing brain failure. It's sort of like Finns having frozen brains [or overheated due to the saunas]. Neither of our brains function specially well, but that's just the way we are made. Hang on a minute, my statements are all reasonable and to me anyway, correct [unless I'm kidding which sometimes is apparently not obvious]. I don't have the time to go dredging for proof for people who really aren't interested in facts - one can see who they are from their approach to discussion. Having been a salesman for a decade or two, one gets to know when one is being given the run around. El Matador wasn't interested in reality because he ignored reasoning about soil strengths from the Urals to Philippines. Same for others who know nothing about Ericy [lack of] patents but want me to do the figuring out on their behalf. Religion is always good fun because it involves unsubstantiated beliefs, which we are all liable too. Shareholders ARE the company, so if they finance or own shares in the sale or use of Zyclon B for example, then they are liable if they are aware of the use. What are you talking about 'without the slightest semblance of proof'? There has been plenty of demonstration of L M Ericsson's and others' such as Nokia's attitudes. It's all becoming a bit irrelevant now that nearly everyone agrees CDMA is the future and GSM is heading for the dump. When Bill Frezza was conducting his anti-CDMA Frezza Forum while in the 3 day a month consultancy employ of L M Ericsson, having worked as a director of marketing or some such, it was pretty simple to see that he was a spokesman for L M Ericsson. Whether they were giving him instructions or not is irrelevant. He was representing their interests - if CDMA could be squashed, that was just fine by L M Ericsson; it served their interests. He was also being simultaneously paid by them, perhaps for other services, but nearly anyone would see that a person could not claim to be unbiased if they are in the employ or enjoying financial or other benefit from some action. A judge for example would absolutely disqualify themself from hearing a case against L M Ericsson if they were a shareholder. I think your thinking must be frozen or overheated! Maurice