To: average joe who wrote (15656 ) 3/11/1999 10:48:00 PM From: chummer Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 26850
AJ,from WillP,please read carefully: First, I would like to thank Buffalo Bill for posting this for me. I rarely consider replying to trivial posts such as this, but will make an exception just this once. Individuals such as 'average joe' create much carnage on these forums. That's too bad. Point 1. There is nothing material to 'debate' with him. His posts on this forum lack knowledge of the mining industry, and lack ability to compose coherent arguments. For example, do you remember the "You need $2000 a tonne to make a mine." argument? It was a classic. Not! The words he uttered in his recent post on the "WillP Speaks..." thread have already been dealt with time and time again, by myself and by others. Re-stating an incorrect position will not make it correct, even if you laboured under the misconception that I was unable to reach you here. Sorry. :-) Oh...and by the way...nice trick. That way you started it off looks like it was some 'rebuttal' you posted on Stockwatch. Nope. No such post on Stockwatch. Just a childish little trick by a childish little boy. But there's worse conduct to follow... Point 2. This poster has managed to sucker a number of you into baiting the supporters of other, less fortunate companies. Two prominent ones are Kensington Resources (KRT), and Ashton Canada (ACA). Here's a suggestion. Ask any of the regulars on those threads what they feel about 'average joe'. That might give you a broad hint. Consider his conduct on the Ashton Mining of Canada thread. He first appears on August 6, 1998 in post 5985, announcing he has just bought shares. In post 6009, (August 10) he announces a 90% certainty that Ashton has a mine in the Buffalo Hills. By August 10 in post 6016, he decides that "statistics are not grabbed out of the air. ACA will with 90% certainty have a diamond mine." Wow!!! It gets better. On August 14 in post 6053, he proclaims "...I think it incredibly honest when one of us broadcasts his intention to buy, I do it and I'm glad Frank does it. Whatever diamet is trading at right now ACA should be twice that...". Frank, hmmm. Remember that name. By October 29, the tune has changed. In post 6427, he says, "It turns out that ACA kimberlites while diamond bearing may not be kimberlite at all. They would be classified as a kimberlitoid...". Well, that's neat. He struggles with 'orangite', but creates a new term himself. Cool. He clearly turns bearish before the results are announced, as evidenced by numerous posts. Fine. With the release of the disappointing results, he manages to gloat in many subsequent posts. Try this one...number 6888 on November 24, 1998: "HA HA HA - and not one of you has the decency to admit I was right. Well c'mon sell, right now, all of you. Remember, buy low sell high. Until you figure out that basic market strategy you might as well sit around camp fires eating monkey brains listening to Frank!!" Wow...there's that name again. Apparently the optimism was now all Frank's fault. A further follow-up continues this theme in post 6906 to Buffalo Bill: " I think you should change your name to Custer!!! Well you have a right to be bitter. Frankie sold you boys a bill of goods that you believed in. Thank God for true believers,I was able to get out of this baby right before she tanked. I did that on the warrants a few years ago. I don't mind rubbing it in at all, Thank you very much." What a real sweetheart 'average joe' is! Point 3. He first appears on the Winspear Resources thread in August 1998, well after the mini bulk sample results. His first post was a response to Charters about 'salting'. There's a neat little bit of fiction in post 7537 on this thread about having witnessed a salt in August of 1994. I'll leave it to the reader to decide which key parts of that story make it a sure falsehood. He has come and gone since then...and his conduct has been childish and his information has been asinine. But most of you know that. Tell ya what, 'average joe'. You *really* want to have a constructive debate with me? OK...let's go for it. Here's the deal. State your opinions, support your arguments with reasoned debate, facts, etc. I'll do the same. Just remember...your tired little tricks and attempts to pass yourself off as "someone" sure as hell aren't going to work on me. I don't give a damn *who* you are...but I sure know *what* you are. Have a nice evening, WillP