Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (9126)	3/11/1999 8:56:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

That last post by Fred M. Kellett shows more class than most posters can muster. Certainly more than me, and most certainly more than any naysayer could possibly admit. Justification for Valence is imminent! MJ

To: FMK who wrote (9126)	3/11/1999 9:44:00 PM
From: jean1057	Respond to of 27311

FMK..I take the occasion to thank you for all your research , you provided to the thread...I for myself have been intrigued by the potential of VLNC for many years, and am still holding ALL my shares...the attacks of some individuals should not bother you, and obviously does not anyway.....As we all know the line between being called a guru or a looser is very thin....your time to be called guru will certainly come with VLNC.....I hope, for my own advantage, it will be sooner than later.......patience........unfortunately ....

To: FMK who wrote (9126)	3/11/1999 10:25:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

<<I admit my timing has been rather poor.>> Mr. Kellett, it is one thing to suffer from "poor timing" if your mistakes are due to errors in your own analysis. Anybody who bought this stock over the last several years (with the possible exception of those who bought in the $3's and $4's last summer) has suffered from that problem. It is quite another thing to quote "knowledgeable sources" saying that "production is imminent" for more than two years now. I don't buy your innocent "My timing was poor" routine. In case you have forgotten, here is a small sample of what your inside sources have told you over the years. Message 7069515 Either you have been making up these "knowledgeable sources" over the last two years, or they are so full of it that not a word of what they say should be believed. Just my humble opinion.