SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bretsky who wrote (109170)3/11/1999 11:49:00 PM
From: Sammie  Respond to of 176387
 
It's all good Baby.......

pathfinder.com
Never Bet Against
Michael Dell

When Dell's stock slipped for two weeks in February, some analysts talked up Gateway. Then Dell announced his next moves.

Amy Kover

When Michael Dell stopped by FORTUNE in late February, it seemed as if his company's days as the darling of the PC world were ending. For the past two years investors had gotten used to around 50% annual revenue growth from Dell Computer, and its stock price had boomed 1,214%, to a high of $108.63. But on Feb. 12, BancBoston Robertson Stephens analyst Daniel Niles slashed his fourth-quarter revenue estimates from the consensus $5.5 billion to $5.2 billion--a mere 38% or so jump from fourth-quarter 1997--citing "flattening component costs and increased direct competition." Richard Gardner of Salomon Smith Barney chimed in with similar concerns.

Niles turned out to be eerily correct: Four days later Dell reported fourth-quarter revenues of $5.173 billion. By Feb. 19 the stock price had been battered down 26%, to $80. So some analysts began looking past Dell and casting eyes at former consumer-PC outcast Gateway 2000. Despite a spotty earnings record and a reputation for poor service, the company had developed a three-pronged marketing strategy that some experts believed would characterize the future of the PC industry--and maybe even propel Gateway past Dell.

Dream on. By early March, Dell had confounded its doubters by announcing two major developments in rapid-fire succession, and its stock recouped some of the losses. (For that matter, even its "disappointing" 38% increase in revenue would be a fantasy come true for most companies.)

First, Dell launched an e-commerce Website, Gigabuys.com, through which it will sell more than 30,000 outside products such as software, printers, and even games (adding to its $14 million in daily sales involving the Web). It's a great way for the company to squeeze more revenue from its consumer base. And as Michael Kwatinetz of Credit Suisse First Boston puts it, "Through Gigabuys, Dell can build a stronger, longer-lasting relationship with customers than by simply selling them a box."

Also exciting, Dell cut a seven-year, $16 billion pact with IBM for components used mostly in the very large computers that it sells to major companies. Because IBM's technology is considered top quality, the deal could strengthen Dell's position in that business. To produce components itself, Dell would have to get into a whole new line of business. "Essentially it's a marriage of one company that has terrific technology to one with great marketing," says Walter Winnitzki of Hambrecht & Quist. And analyst Phil Rueppel of BT Alex. Brown predicts that there could be more Dell-IBM deals to come. For instance: "It would make sense for Dell to produce PCs for IBM." Sums up Mark Specker of the research firm SoundView: "Once again Dell continues to prove how fiercely competitive it is, and it won't be left behind when it comes to execution."

Dell's snappy comeback emphasizes that it and Gateway are playing in very different leagues. Gateway focuses mainly on consumers and small companies, whereas Dell deals with bigger businesses and on a much larger scale.

So why did analysts get so excited about Gateway in the first place? The buzz started with Ashok Kumar, tech analyst for U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. Kumar had actually downgraded Dell back in November and was peeved that Niles' Feb. 12 downgrade had overshadowed his. Taking another bold leap, on Feb. 22 he upgraded Gateway from a "buy" to "strong buy." He also announced a ridiculously inflated estimate for fourth-quarter earnings--90 cents per share, vs. the consensus 60 cents.

Annoyed Gateway officials told analysts at a recent conference to stick with the consensus. But Kumar's call caught on. Within two days, Gateway's stock had soared by over $10, to a 52-week high of $83. (It has dropped back since then.) And NB Montgomery upgraded its rating to "buy" from "hold."

The Gateway boomlet was based on more than just one analyst's estimate. At its root is the general assumption that the entire PC industry will be facing slower revenue growth and increased price competition as consumer demand for high-priced computers eases: With PC ownership expanding to lower-income groups, fewer new buyers can afford expensive models. In that sort of world, the only way to make money is to persuade people to buy components and, someday, another computer. And Gateway has a plan to capture such a recurring revenue stream by making itself accessible.

For instance, it is populating America's strip malls with what it calls Country Stores--storefronts designed to lure Sunday drivers and small-business owners as well as provide a service center for veteran users. It's also learning to use the Internet, booking $10 million per day in Web-related sales. In addition, Gateway actually beat Dell to the punch in e-commerce by buying a portion of online retailer NECX a week before Dell launched Gigabuys.

A brilliant strategy isn't enough, however. Gateway also has to execute it. So CEO Ted Waitt has brought in a new management team, which he hopes will solve the company's periodic problems of poor service and delivery. But there are anecdotal signs, at least, that things have yet to improve. Money.com, for example, recently received a note complaining, "Since Jan. 18 (Gateway's internet) service has been extremely poor to nonexistent."

Nevertheless, something clearly has changed: Dell's late-February slide gave Gateway an opportunity to make new friends, even if they're back in love with Dell now. "Gateway showed that it's a trendsetter," H&Q's Winnitzki says. So there still might be room for Gateway to flourish--albeit in Dell's shadow.



To: Bretsky who wrote (109170)3/11/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: Sammie  Respond to of 176387
 
Nope...Just more good news...
fool.com./portfolios/RuleMaker/RuleMaker.htm

Not Only Rule Makers Make Rules

By Al Levit

Glendale, CA (March 11, 1999) --

"What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
-- William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet
Tom Gardner says that Dell Computer Corp. (Nasdaq: DELL) isn't a Rule Maker. I guess since Tom wrote the book that defined Rule Makers, his decision stands. Even so, Dell sure has made a lot of the PC industry rules that others are following. As I noted yesterday, Dell's direct-order method of selling computers is the industry standard. The only question that remains is how closely Dell's competitors can imitate its example.

Dell made the rules; now everyone follows along. For example, Dell has Premiere Web pages for major corporate customers. I wonder how long it will be before Dell's competitors jump on that bandwagon? In addition, Dell is now working to offer customers a chance to buy fast Web connections at the time they buy a Dell computer. No doubt, the competitors will copycat that as well.

But there's more to being a Rule Maker then setting the industry standards. In fact, a Rule Maker doesn't have to be the first-mover in product and service development. (Right Oak?) Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT), arguably, has never been first in anything. But woe to the first-mover company when Microsoft decides to enter the game! Seems to me that we're reading the same kind of sentiment from Dale Wettlaufer, co-manager of the Boring Portfolio, which owns Gateway (NYSE: GTW). Here are his thoughts as he considers that Dell might decide to move into the consumer end the PC business:

"Dell might turn up the heat in the consumer sector. As owners of Gateway, that's not something we want to hear. But we have heard it and we have to deal with it. Hearing [rumors] that Dell [might] open stores like Gateway Country validates our appreciation of what Gateway has done here, but it's also a bummer to hear that someone else is jumping into that space so quickly."
-- Dale Wettlaufer (Boring Report -- 2/17/99)
We got a similar thought expressed by Fool analyst Warren Gump after Dell announced it will be selling computer-related products on the Web:

"Who will the winners be [in the computer products e-tailing battle]? Most likely they will be the ones who create a strong brand name, develop a loyal customer base, provide reasonable prices, offer excellent customer service, and have deep pockets. Based on its success in achieving these characteristics in the personal computer business, Dell is likely to be a strong contender in this field as well."
-- Warren Gump (Fool Plate Special, 3/3/99)
Dell's Gigabuys.com site wasn't even up and running when Warren wrote that piece, but the market had already recognized the site as one of the leading computer products e-tailers.

If it looks like a Rule Maker, walks like a Rule Maker, talks like a Rule Maker, and performs better than a Rule Maker, then it must be a Merchant King. Whatever you want to call it, Dell is one great company to own. But the Rule Maker managers have talked it over, and we won't be putting Dell in the Rule Maker portfolio. The company simply does not have the high-margin Rule Maker business model that we require.

But that doesn't mean you shouldn't put Dell in your own portfolio if you want to; just like I put Dell in mine. You'll just have to remember that as a Merchant King, Dell must be analyzed a little differently than a typical Rule Maker. You might want to spend some time over in the Boring Portfolio, because they analyze high asset-turnover companies like Dell all the time.

When I conclude this series tomorrow, I'll start out with a few tips on how to dig into Dell's financials, and then I'll finish up by getting into some of the concerns that Tom laid out last month about Dell going forward.

Don't forget to voice your opinion on the question of the week. We're considering the inclusion of antitrust scrutiny as one of our Monopoly Status criteria. So far, the consensus seems to be that a "Goldilocks" antitrust scenario is best. That is to say, a full-blown antitrust trial is too costly and distracting to be considered a positive for a company. On the other end of the spectrum, a total lack of concern from the trustbusters indicates that a company has no monopoly power whatsoever. But in between lies a scenario that's "just right" -- an antitrust investigation, but with enough company glad-handing to avoid an actual trial. Do you agree? If so or if not, share your thoughts to the Strategy message board.

Finally, if you're new to Rule Maker Land, be sure to bring any and all questions to our new message board, Rule Maker Beginners.

Fool on,

Al

Rule Maker Strategy



To: Bretsky who wrote (109170)3/12/1999 12:07:00 AM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
What are you going to buy? One of the cheesy CPU from Cyrix? Why not buy sub 1k from with Intel inside.

Greg



To: Bretsky who wrote (109170)3/12/1999 4:58:00 AM
From: D. Swiss  Respond to of 176387
 
M2, good thing Dell doesn't buy from NSM.

:o)

Drew