Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AJ Berger who wrote (11274)	3/12/1999 9:14:00 AM
From: Annette	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27722

I don't think NAVR is what you call worthless.

To: AJ Berger who wrote (11274)	3/12/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Patric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

<<Patric Notices the Emperor has no Cloths>> AJ, At the risk of contributing to the pointless bickering that has come to be so common here, I feel compelled to respond to a couple of the insinuations in your post, which by the way seemed pretty condescending in tone (do you wonder why people react to you the way they do? But I digress)... 1. Maybe something I wrote led you to infer that I was calling NAVR a "worthless" company, but that certainly was not my intent. Even though you were the one to first use the word "worthless" in this exchange, you seemed to retract that characterization in your subsequent post to Annette, so it looks to me as if you were trying to put that word into my mouth. I agree with Annette that, quite apart from NetRadio, which has tremendous potential, Navarre has a lot of potential on its own, and if it really does become "debt-free" in the near future so much the better (I am still not sure what the correct read on that issue is). 2. The first line of your post also seems to imply that I had somehow suddenly become sufficiently enlightened to come over to your point of view. Don't flatter yourself. I have always tried to consider and recognize legitimate, relevant information both in my own decisions and in my occasional on-topic posts (which I readily concede are infrequent and do not usually add much original information--I never claimed to be a genius). The point I was TRYING to make was a fairly obvious one, namely that the price of a stock cannot be accurately predicted at any point in time by the kind of number crunching we were getting from Rajiv, even though it is useful and interesting information. I do agree with you that supply and demand is always the ultimate driving force in the movement of a stock's price, even when other factors seem to be at play. #B~\|> P.S. I never claimed to write short, simple sentences, either.