SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (38085)3/12/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The whole reason we supported the butcher in the first place was as a buffer for a zealous Shi'ite regime in Iran, that might have been motivated to start a jihad against the Saudi regime, towards which it is hostile, for the sake of control of Mecca and Medina, and, not so incidentally, the lion's share of the earth's proven oil reserves. The Iranians are less dangerous now, but not wholly tamed, and Assad still entertains hopes of a Greater Syria that would, if pursued, be seriously destabilizing. Plus, the Turks and Iranians are terrified of a Kurdish rump state, and might set upon the Kurds with renewed ferocity if they felt threatened. All of which is to say that you are right, even the elimination of Saddam Hussein may not result in a favorable outcome...



To: Les H who wrote (38085)3/12/1999 11:27:00 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Les,

Can you define a "favorable" outcome. I can't.