Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IMOT, the Yahoo of China?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: $Mogul who wrote (316)	3/12/1999 3:59:00 PM
From: Retired41	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 781

Mogul, I have been posted referenced facts. I know your posts are as factual as anyone can get without stating the obvious and many problems with this likely scammy award winner. Don't you see, an honest trustworthy company easily makes those available as they are done BEFORE you start trading. Otherwise how do you know what the stock is worth you are selling away from your control. Look up all my posts. The problem is with this stock is that every FACT you can get your hands around stinks: 1. Typical scam PR guy in florida is the U.S. office. Someone even said on this thread that this guy was the IR guy. 2. When they rave about results and give numbers they damn themselves as I have pointed out. 3. Their web site is pretty but has no value. Go ahead and explore it. 4. China economics and its currency/banking/modernization problems are incredibly well known and documented. They can't even feed their population. 5. No U.S. trust accounts to discover and inspect. on and on and on C'mon, you made some money, take it and see what happens. But don't play the rest of us for fools. This is an incredible risky bet. At best it is a traders stock that has run its course by ANY reasonable measure of reality. I just can't see how anybody can dispute that. Indeed no one actually has. All that has been done is the hurling of insults. Is this how business should be done?