Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (31257)	3/12/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 33344

Scumbria, Pravin, Kash Well, if what Kash says is true and NSMs .18 is like Intels .22 that would explain it. Especially when you compare voltages. 2.0v (Intel) vs 2.2 AMD and 2.2 Cyrix. But didn't we just see PR366 at 2.2? This would imply that .18u would be lower voltage wouldn't it? I was under the assumption that the M-II-PR333 and below were 2.9v on .35 (or.28), the PR366 and PR380 were 2.2 volts on .25u, so wouldn't a PR400 run on even less voltage? Also, the GX ran at 266 on .35u, I would hope it would run a whole lot faster than 300 MHz, even on NSMs .18u. If not, doesn't sound like much process improvemnt to me. What is the Mhz for a PR400 anywho?