SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SAFESKIN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fbk32 who wrote (696)3/12/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: W Shakespeare  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 828
 
Anyone notice that Gruntal has not yet removed the "Strong Buy" rating on SFSK? Perhaps the analyst's foot is lodged so deeply in his/her throat that any statement is impossible. I will sell my holdings on the dead cat bounce. This management has proven itself untrustworthy. Question: How many Safeskin officers does it take to screw $50,000,000 worth of superior, high quality, powderless gloves to shareholders?



To: Fbk32 who wrote (696)3/13/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: John Ritter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 828
 
While good advice after the barn burned you seem to prefer really small CAP stocks. SAFESKIN did indeed take a hit and is not a tech stock so I have no real opinions. However, I do review crashes and from a 'gut' reaction this one is not for me. Recently I liked SIPX at 12 and loved much more at 9, before it went down from 26, I liked AWRE at 9, and PAIR at 8. But I have also learned that when there are lawsuits in the newsfeed, beware, there may be termites, and stock certificates are made from paper. I would rather own RDRT on a DD sector play over gloves anyday...+