Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (51642)	3/12/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Is that called the blunderbuss approach? <GGGGG>

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (51642)	3/12/1999 2:38:00 PM
From: Merritt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

MB: Re SANG: As you may remember, I used to be bullish on SANG, and I've traded it a few times...but with the company guiding analysts lower, and Vector cutting estimates for 1999 from .96 to (.73), I'm no longer interested...and that was before the Novartis suit (which was probably to be expected). My only question is why it's held up as well as it did, although I suppose it was the intro of thymoglobulin (even though that doesn't figure to be a biggie, IMHO). I won't be surprised if it drops to the low teens. I may be a buyer if gets to 12 1/2, but the operative word is may . Incidentally, I was talking to you about BXM on P* a year or so ago (it was BIOX at the time). Don't know if you ever bought some...but I thought I'd mention that I sold mine last week. It's a good company, with good products, but I felt it had gotten way ahead of itself. Best regards, Merritt