Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (38133)	3/12/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

No doubt. On this particular forum he began early on insulting people directly. Perhaps things had gotten bad for him on another forum, but here he certainly started out pretty uncharitably. 5618 (to JLA) Tee hee. Character does matter, and you're a character for sure. Decline and fall, blah blah blah. Bunch of Sodomites in D.C., eh? Let's burn down the house! 5628 (to JLA) Cool. You're a totally independent pompous moralizer. 5660 (to Vaughn) You better take this up with compatriot jlallen, Bill. Now that she's revealed herself as a devotee of Rand, she presumably doesn't need a religious base for her pompous moralizing. Are you less secure? 5663 (to Vaughn) So, Bill, do you want to explain the substantial, fact based connection between Leno, SNL, and the polls? Personally, I think you're a joke, but jlallen is funnier. 5726 (JLA) I'm a pompous idiot? I'd agree you're greatly disturbed, of course. 5777 (to Dwight) You're nuts. No smear or innuendo is too low for you guys. Who killed Vince Foster anyway? You forgot that one. 5836 (to Bill) Enjoy your allegedly Christian life. 5869 (to Dwight) Nice to see more holier-than-thou humor from the good Christian Dwight. No pompous moralizing here, no-sir-ree. 5873 (etc, etc.) Anita Hill was a somewhat reluctant witness, as you probably choose not to recall. And she was hounded out of her tenured faculty position by good right-wing Christians like yourself 5907 (etc.) Why jlallen, you've joined Mr. Vaughn in the transcendental meditation business I see. -- I of course eventually got into the mix and harshly insulted Daniel and many others without a lot of mercy. I am not proud of it, and have apologized. He is obviously still hurting about it. I can do none else. I have apologized and so I have no burden at all about it. Even so, though the things I said here were said with too much pleasure and too harshly, I believe many of them nevertheless true. Daniel certainly was no angel here, and from what I can see he never has been much of an angel. I can hardly find reason for him to assault you so harshly. I do believe he applies a standard of charity to others that he fails to apply to himself. And I do believe that before he can expect others to treat him like an adult, he should first apologize. This is about all I will say on the matter. So if Daniel begins to foam at the mouth here, and if I do not respond, you will know why.