Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (2236)	3/13/1999 8:03:00 AM
From: re: MAX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

Bear Down, You are right about one thing - MLRE will go to $3.00 a share - IMO! It took a bath on lousy journalism at Stock Detective. Just because Stock Detective could not get answers fast enough, they badmouthed MLRE owners. When you badmouth a stock BEFORE all the fundamentals are in, it tends to bring the price down - which is the tactic you, Flodyie,(who is really not liked on other threads, too) Apavlovic (sp), and Anthony@Pacific use. That story definitely caused EVERYONE to bail on January 4th. That story left ALL who were holding MLRE to lose a lot of money. That, coupled with your totally negative comments hurt a lot of people. I don't mind that you are negative on some stocks - that's your right, and it keeps people on their toes. You claimed you were not holding any MLRE, therefore, you had no vested interest in the stock. So - why would you intentionally want to hurt both the owners of MLRE and their shareholders, and never both a chance to succeed? Are you a crusader - like Anthony@Pacific? Why do you attempt to hurt people on this thread, too - along with your cronies? How many shares of SNMM do you own? Why not state FACTS, if they are negative? FACTS about SNMM would be relevant, and we on the thread can check them out. You have a right to your own "IMO", as anyone does, but you seem to take sections of some SEC rule way out of context, you try to make it SNMM specific, (as only one example), but the stock price climbs anyway! Go figure! I think I have the answer - maybe the investors here don't listen to you? Best regards anyway, Off to work for a living. . . re:MAX