To: Moonglow who wrote (15039 ) 3/13/1999 9:40:00 AM From: DR. MEADE Read Replies (2) | Respond to
As you can see, J. Nelson, is back, and trying to bash and confuse. Unfortunately, "bully ",again,seems to be trying to do the same. J. Nelson, your accusations and conclusions are deplorable. You said that because there was no release after the bell, as incorrectly posted by "Lola", then the anticipated release was somehow rescheduled for Monday seems unacceptable to you. " Lola" has already cleared that up by stating that she was mistaken , and said release was set for Monday. Regardless, why does the timing of a release make you "bash " NPEC and others who post here. Your frustration is your frustration, and you are as free as anyone to express it here. But why does it always turn to "bashing" and attack and a distortion of what is posted here ? It seems to me that NPEC is currently focused and moving in the right direction. Why don't you give them a chance ? All you do is criticize and bash. Dave D. has been pretty much on target with his statements concerning NR's recently. Why don't you back off and give the company a chance to prove itself ? You accuse others of misleading, however, in truth, are you not making accusations about them and the company which you have no substance of fact ? OK, you bought higher and you have lost money. OK, NPEC has disappointed you in the past. OK , you are frustrated and angry . This does not give you a license to distort, contort, and by implication and inference, as well as by innuendo, mis-characterize either NPEC or some of us here who think NPEC has a bright future. I hesitated to write this , because your usual posts are ramblings of nonsense, and I really don't have the tolerance or patience to read a possible reply of the same measure. I would,though , appreciate that you read this post with an open mind, and if you feel the need to respond, please do so in a coherent, mature, objective, and thoughtful way. TIA, MAGGIE **** ps, I hope that your previous responses are not a result of the fact that you may not have got the message yesterday of anticipated Mon. release ?
