Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (2261)	3/13/1999 12:36:00 PM
From: re: MAX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

Bear Down, MLRE did end up with their beautiful, new location shortly after you and some of your friends alleged that the building was a scam, too. They have basically done what they said they would do. The Stock Detective article killed them. I don't care what your position is with any stock. Sometimes,it's nice to know, and some people don't mind telling what their position is. You have declared that you are short SNMM >> As far as my position on SNMM. I am short <<, so I believe that you need to see the price of the shares decrease here. As long as I know that your intent with SNMM is to badmouth it to where you can buy back in below $7.00, I'm fine with your motives. Why you spent hundreds of hours posting on MLRE still baffles me, but hey, who am I to critique why people do strange things and waste time doing "DD" in the negative? I still wish you the best of luck, but I think you'll need some salt to go with the shares of SNMM you'll be eating because the price ain't going anywhere but up. re:MAX

To: Bear Down who wrote (2261)	3/13/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: David M. Green	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

Mr. Down> As far as my position on SNMM. I am short somewhere between 100 and 25,000 shares. My exact position is none of your business. Depending on the level of your short position within the range you indicate, I would characterize your judgment running the gamut from silly to dumb to idiotic to insane. Your downside potential is pretty limited, while the upside risk is huge. I suggest you have your clicker finger hovering over the "order submit" button to cover quickly. In any case, your penchant to gamble against the odds is ironically why Starnet will succeed, don't you see that?