Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9705)	3/13/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: Ed Fishbaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev Interesting mix of metaphors, the doe and the guillotine. It was good to hear from you at last. As I recall your last post when GPGI was around 15 cents, had it that we were on our way to 3 cents. If true, the collapse from 40 cents to 3 cents will hurt much more than from 15 cents to 3 cents. Perhaps the guillotine would be preferable. Ed

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9705)	3/13/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Respond to of 14226

Zeev, << frozen like a doe in the headlights of an oncoming truck,>> Is that truck hauling turnips? VBG Tim

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9705)	3/14/1999 2:34:00 AM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Zeev, have you been hauling turnips at night in the desert near the GPGI site, with your headlights on high beam ? could explain recent UFO sightings in that area maybe Richard high-tailed it outta here because of his encounter with an UFO this was not the first time Richard had this UFO encounter but Richard decided that this was to be his last let others continue with the UFO ( Unbelievable Forecast Obtained ) But Zeev, eventho I understand none of the mining talk, I do remember that a post or two last year mentioned that of all the desert dirts, that GPGI has the best dirt. So I see nothing new here, just the same confirmation thru more tests run under the new Facilities Manager Mike McKay. For one to conclude that this new & improved GPGI to repeat past mistakes, one would have to either say that this Mike person has "cooked" the numbers, or that he has been totally hoodwinked by the others at the site. Mike being a GPGI employee, I will guess that a pump and dump of his large holdings would be illegal. As for Mike being tricked by one that does not want GPGI to use an extraction method not of "his own", then could it be possible that the numbers were falsified not by Mike, but by another without Mike being aware of it ? Seems like soon Mike will know the answer to this hypothetical question. ... initial sample shipment was sent to Sabin Metals Inc. ... Four additional samples sent ... should receive their analysis reports before the end of March. ... have completed additional tests ... Results continue to be very encouraging ... Actual results will be reported in the shareholders update March 16 Question: "Actual results will be reported...March 16" Seems like the numbers to be reported here are from the in-house tests, not the Sabin Metals Inc. analysis report. Am I correct ? If I am, then why, with GPGI's past goof-ups, would they report good numbers, and then a week or 2 later get the Sabin Metals report that will either confirm or not GPGI's internal testing ? Only can take Sabin's checks to the bank, not more broken promises. Maybe Mike already has proof that all is ok. If so, then Mike will take all shareholders to the moon. Or Mike will have fooled all but Richard. I'am still not a gpgi shareholder, but atleast by the end of this month the Mike factor will be knowned, and I'll stay on the sidelines along with Zeev as we both hope the moon shot takes off. My money is not where my mouth is, but I think Mike already has his bags packed for a trip to the moon. Doug