Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 91fxrs who wrote (4630)	3/13/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 9818

I don't know where the reporters are getting their info from, unless something has changed in the last week it is 70%: (Doesn't mean anything any ways) The reporter in LA (Friday) said 45% and the reporter in Australia (Sat) said 40%. yardeni.com As of March 1999, I still see a 70% chance of a severe global recession. I am the first to admit that there is nothing scientific about my assessment. It is not based on a rigorous global economic model. It is simply my own subjective evaluation of the situation, as documented in this netbook. I am assigning a probability to a Y2K recession scenario to communicate my level of conviction and concern. - - - - - - - - - >>>nothing scientific about my assessment<<< Well, just another economists "prediction" that doesn't mean dick! Yardeni said: I am the first to admit that there is nothing scientific about my assessment. Too the doomers, this is fact. Your voice of reason Cheeky Kid