Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rande Is. . .FISHING. . [under $1.50] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

That's an excellent write up Rande ... I would like to read Part I if you do not mind ... I searched for it but was unable to find it easily. Keep up the good work on educating investors ... This industry is vicious especially when it comes to greed vs integrity, shorters vs investors, etc. :-) Gary

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 6:18:00 PM
From: maui91	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

thank you thank you thank you !!!!!!!!!!!!!and thank you again.

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: QuietWon	Respond to of 4766

Rande, I read your post and it was eye - opening. I've linked it to my new site SEC Investigations - just type 'SEC' in the subject category I see the whole area becoming more and more of an issue, and trying to have a single thread solely dedicated to the issues. I'm learning more and more every day

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 8:45:00 PM
From: christopher	Respond to of 4766

Good post Rande... Chris

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 10:37:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Respond to of 4766

Rande your analysis is flawed and biased and has almost, ZERO merit..but then again your PRFM hype also had the same qualities as most of your reccomendations ..Noone can possibly get the SEC to do anything that it itself doesnt decisde is worth doing..so hundreds ofd compani9es get complaints but only a few actually end up being investigated..relax and try to by stocks beased on earnings and fundamentals and leave the long term potenetial stuff in the can where it belongs

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/13/1999 10:42:00 PM
From: Richard Miller	Respond to of 4766

Randy IS is a name I have noticed several times on SI threads, in connection with totally untenable positions, IMO. He is a sore loser. Randy-you are the perfect subject for the adage: "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen" There is one tiny difference between the hypsters and the short crowd. The former generally lie, the later to the best of my knowledge tell it like it is. Our Constitution protects Freedom of the Press, as well as Freedom of Speech to allow exposes of wrongdoing without fear of legal reprisals. While you are entitled to your opinion, it is sad you can't figure out the difference between good guys and bad guys. Richard

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: Daniel Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

Rande, I think you should publish that as an editorial. Wow! Great writing. For awhile there I thought it was an article from WSJ.

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 3:05:00 AM
From: MoneyMade	Respond to of 4766

Bravo! Rande Is grat article...It's on my thread now! MoneyMade

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 3:19:00 AM
From: MoneyMade	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

NASD Rules states: "Because the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protects freedom of speech, the SEC cannot simply prohibit newsletters from recommending or touting particular stocks. But when newsletters receive payment for touting, the securities laws require them to disclose specifically who paid them, the amount, and the type of payment (cash, stock, or some other thing of value)" sec.gov "The Commission continues to consider the 1998 proposal to require disclosure in the Form S-8 of the names of any consultants and advisors who will receive securities under the registration statement, as well as the amount of securities to be offered to each and the nature of the consulting or advisory services, and related comment requests" Now "Touting" what the hell does that mean the word is very general...for instance how many times can one say buy EUTO before the SEC considers it touting? 5,6,20 times...Also, what if it was Microsoft instead of a penny company would it be the same outrage. Joe Park's case is HUGE in terms of everyone's civil liberties. His Disclaimer states his company's mission objectives and obligations.

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 8:45:00 AM
From: Fuzzy	Respond to of 4766

Now you have really got my head spinning. Lots of ideas that make sense to me in your post. Thanks for keeping us all on our toes. Fuzzy

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 11:24:00 AM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

People like you prey on the uninformed... You're just like some snake oil salesman or that evangelist on TV asking for more Grannies to sign their welfare cheques over to him. You make me wretch.

To: Rande Is who wrote (1100)	3/14/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4766

Rande, it would be nice if you got your facts right before trying to act like you know what you're talking about. Only in your dreams and delusions did anyone 'blindly' follow a 'popular SI leader' and 'lose everything' in SEVL. BTW, SEVL only got as high as 10. Beware the grassy knoll! Barb