SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Craig DeHaan who wrote (8970)3/13/1999 8:36:00 PM
From: Nine_USA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11149
 
Craig,

<<Herb, Sorry, I misunderstood your first post that price was one of 50+ factors. I meant
to ask if you had tested it on a market cap filter alone. Whatever the others are they
certainly seem to reinforce a strong price correlation; and compelling in both the high
and low ranges.>>

While the 6 month %returns I previously posted were based
on PRICE LEVEL alone, I use 50+ variables in ranking stocks.

The returns I get using 50+ variables are far better than those
shown for PRICE alone.

Happy to do some studies for MarketCap alone for a couple of 6
month holding periods. We know what they will look like, more
or less, given all the media bleating about big cap/small cap stocks.

<<After Bob let this code become part of the public domain Richard suggested the
refinement of using float factors on volatile / high ATR output as you noted. I've used
Mov(V,34,S)>50K vs 250K to include more thinly traded issues resulting in 1200, but
after the following float screen about 400 candidates remain - a reasonable group to
review with other tests for candidates>>

Looking at the scan you posted with output to ATR89.lst,
if it would be useful, I could do a study or 2 for stocks with:

a) PRICE of 5 & up
b) VOLUME of 250k & up
c) some measure of volatility like QP2 BETA. I don't retain the
. prior 89 days of Closes to do the kind of average volatility
. you use.

d) small float

What kind of holding period?



To: Craig DeHaan who wrote (8970)3/13/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: Nine_USA  Respond to of 11149
 
Craig,

Here is an interesting table showing the last 6 months %return
for several MarketCap groupings of interest:

The MarketCaps were ranked for the QP2 universe of stocks on Sept 10, 1998
The 6 month %returns were computed on March 12, 1999 Closes.

Stocks with MarketCap 6 month %return
--------------------- ---------------

20Bil & up 36.6%
10b to 20b 26.4%
2b to 10b 23.1%
1b to 2b 13.9%
400m to 1b 13.0%
100m to 400m 10.7%
20m to 100m 6.9%

SP500 31.4%

102 highest stocks
on 50+ variables 63.3% (102 to match number 20B & up)

20 highest on 50+ 81.6%



To: Craig DeHaan who wrote (8970)3/13/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: Nine_USA  Respond to of 11149
 
Craig,

Here is another interesting table showing the 6 months %return
for several MarketCap groupings but as begun on March 13, 1998

The MarketCaps were ranked for the QP2 universe of stocks on March 13 1998
The 6 month %returns were computed on Sept 16, 1998 Closes.

Stocks with MarketCap 6 month %return
--------------------- ---------------

20Bil & up -4.3%
10b to 20b -10.4%
2b to 10b -16.0%
1b to 2b -20.8%
400m to 1b -22.5%
100m to 400m -24.7%
20m to 100m -25.5%

SP500 -3.6%

102 highest stocks
on 50+ variables +1.1% (102 to match number 20B & up)

20 highest on 50+ +10.6%

A hedged position:

Long the 8 highest +34.2%
Short the 8 lowest -23.8% (minus means winning as short)
Net 16 above +28.9%

SP500 -3.6%

Bear in mind that these returns are not annual, but 6 month returns,
in a slightly weak market for the best performing indices (SPX OEX)