Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9284)	3/13/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Respond to of 27311

For someone who claims he has no money in VLNC, you have posted 17 times so far today. Many very lengthy posts. I would conservatively state that you have spent 2 hours today writing and posting Wexler cheerleading or other negatively slanted posts on this board. You are either short VLNC, lead a very lonely life, or both. It is Saturday night! Do you really have nothing better to do? I just popped in after tucking the little one in bed, and have a few minutes to kill waiting for the baby sitter to arrive. Thats my excuse, what's yours?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9284)	3/13/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: FMK	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Zeev, we shouldn't forget that the first three lines should have a combined capability of 250 million or more watt hours per year. At $2.50 per watt hour, it amounts to over $600 million in revenue. At half that capacity by year-end, it amounts to $20 per share annual revenue. Add some joint venture and royalty revenues and we might just have some earnings! If it gets really bad and the 30 mln outstanding shares get diluted to 40 million shares, we may have to divide about $200 million earnings by 40 mln shares and have to live with $5 per share earnings. Discount a little more and take $4 per share x a PE of 12.5 (half the market multiple) and a $50 share price is indicated. Did the insiders have good reason for adding shares? Is MCI/Worldcom chairman on Valence's board of directors just for his health? Is there a purpose for increasing the NI staff from 65 to 170 and hiring a COO? Did ex-CFO David Archibald substantially increase his position with his own cash to make a good impression on shareholders? It doesn't sound like a fraudulent or failing company to me!