Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (21322)	3/13/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

So what you are saying is. It's okay to promote or attack stocks when being paid by the Companies or outsiders in question, and not inform the public of said compensation or benefits received from the company or outsiders. Well the SEC says that's illegal, and if you receive said benefits from the Companies, then this must be made public knowledge in the form of disclosure. Something that it seems that The Stink Detective may be guilty of. So, have you received any benefit for the promote, and or attacks on stocks? If you have never received a benefit for attacking a stock, or promoting them, why do you find it hard to believe that others do so with said benefits? RG PS. I have never received any said benefits from any person, firm, and or company for my owning or talking about stocks that I do own. I welcome any evidence that proves otherwise. - To: Hogger (21310 ) From: Janice Shell Saturday, Mar 13 1999 10:21PM ET Reply # of 21322 Well, Hoggie, here's a question for you, and again, of course, it's one that's been asked many times before: How often have Stock Detective's warnings proved accurate? And how many times inaccurate? Their record is in fact excellent. lolololol, naturally!! You just can't get over CYGS, can you?