Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SNRS- Sunrise Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/13/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: OLD JAKE JUSTUS	Respond to of 4140

You can go, or you can stay! Let your conscious be your guide. This is my last post, too!

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/13/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: Richard C	Respond to of 4140

Rumor Mill SKANE, you make valuable input here, stick around. We will all meet in PV Mexico before long, I will get the first round. I agree with your analysis, and looking to get more in the 7.50 to 8.50 range. Good luck.

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/14/1999 12:13:00 AM
From: Robert C. Petersen	Respond to of 4140

Skane, Better go to the doctor and have skin checked, my guess is the doc will find it too thin. You know that a majority of the " old timers" on this thread love you and appreciate your imput..now, if you are trying to go for 100%, you are not being realistic. Remember, unrealistic expectations are premeditated resentments...you have better things to do. So, relax. keep posting and if get a negative response once in a while, consider the source........uncle nysebob2

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/14/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Jay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4140

Stay or go. Do not blame others for your decision. Oh, incidentally, no one meant you any harm.

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/14/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: Katz R Us	Respond to of 4140

Skane, I have to say that it did not appear to me that emil was trying to trash you---please, lighten up. I have always enjoyed your posts and your information. We need to keep cool heads here---that's one of the reasons I rarely post---because I don't want to be attacked! I wish everyone would concentrate on the stock information and stop getting personal. We're all here, presumably, for the same reason---tryin' to make a buck. Barbara

To: majormember who wrote (2172)	3/14/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: sandbag	Respond to of 4140

Skane, Not being one of the original members of this thread, but having followed it since before becoming a member of SI, I am probably not qualified to meet your criteria. But I am going to give my opinion non the less. There have been quite a few very good posters from the beginning, whom provided outstanding DD, and you are one of them. Many of these posters, for one reason or another, have stopped posting. You on the other hand have continued to provide information when available, brought in some excellent TA talent, and have always taken this company to be a serious long term strong company. New comers not with standing, whether you get replies from those participants you expect to or not, the resources that you provide to this thread and the connections you have brought together to make a clear picture of where SNRS is and is going are invaluable. Stopping posting to this thread would be a loss to any serious SNRS followers, whether old timers or new people doing research as this company grows. As some people were in a position to buy 100,000 shares at <$1 and kick back until it turned into a $1,000,000+, there are many that are or were not. This makes for the need for different trading styles and should not be construed as being for or against this company. FWIW....I hope you do not take your knowledge, contacts, thoughts, and opinions private. Best Always Barry [edit] TA is not a rumor any more than FA is. It is a tool and should not be taken lightly. Posting TA leaves it up to the individual to determine whether or not they feel it will or will not happen. Anyone who "bashes" someone because of what TA is indicating, is obviously not very familiar with TA.