SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (38303)3/14/1999 3:27:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I already told you that I consider third trimester abortions to be obvious infanticide, and only justifiable in the event of an immediate grave threat to the mother.



To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (38303)3/14/1999 9:54:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Respond to of 67261
 
Neocon's question did not concern infanticide as judged by the Old Testament. So you should not have him judge “adolescentcide” as judged by the Old Testament. His question concerned infanticide in general.

Even so, your counter to Neocon is flawed. The Old Testament adolescent could not be stoned merely for existing. Yet today the unborn child can.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News