SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob Davis who wrote (23629)3/14/1999 10:56:00 AM
From: The Phoenix  Respond to of 77399
 
Rob,

If you have the time to respond to each of Jach's posts please do. However, the problem is he posts about 12 different issues in sequence. Personally I can argue every one of his points but I don't have that kind of time. Furthermore, in the past when he has been challenged on a position (which I have done on a number of occassions) he ignores the post and thus no quality discussion ever occurs. It's a disservice to the thread to simply post negative opionions and press and not have a discussion about it. In fact, Jach is posting these positions only to unnerve people....not to have a discussion. That my friend is the frustration you are seeing.

OG



To: Rob Davis who wrote (23629)3/14/1999 5:58:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Respond to of 77399
 
The last few posts appear to be flames of jach personally.

Since my last post, I see two ignored jach posts, a post agreeing with me about browsemaster.com (sort of about jach), three posts about jach, yours (which is also about jach), then one about jach, four to jach, one from jach, one about jach, two to jach, and finally, finally, one not about or to jach. The first 16 of 17 messages in this thread were jach or jach-induced.

If he were simply ignored he'd end up getting bored and would stop posting. As it is now, he gets his ego stoked by all the talk about him.



To: Rob Davis who wrote (23629)3/14/1999 7:22:00 PM
From: DownSouth  Respond to of 77399
 
Rob,
Suggest you lurk around here for awhile to see why responding to the thread moron is like arguing with your little brother.



To: Rob Davis who wrote (23629)3/16/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: The Phoenix  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77399
 
So Rob,

Now you see why Jach has such a bad reputation. I responded to perhaps 5 of his 10 posts (as you suggested). He returned one comment back to which I shared my views in the interest of discussion. Jach hasn't responded to any of these posts. Rather he only responds to those that have made personal comments towards him. You see, they've all seen this for months. Jach can't carry on adult conversation and can not support his claims or positions. So, folks are irritated with his "the sky is falling" claims. Thus, the attacks. So, now I challenge you. Can you get Jach to enter into a reasonable discourse as to why he feels the way he does about this stock?

OG