Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet(SNMM)-"The Microsoft of Internet Gaming Softwar -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roofman who wrote (4)	3/14/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: Jack Turner	Respond to of 40

Thank you for starting this tread. It makes me sick that the shorts play such evil games. I just found a post that shows I am not the only one that picked up on Flo's real intent. All she did was start a thread so that people wanting to do DD after seeing the awesome news out this week would have her crap thrown in there face. Come on really to complain that SI allowed a link to appear in a public forum post and in her post puts the link and uses descriptive adult words. Go take a look at Yahoo, Excite, Lycos sweetie. And while you are at it take a look at who they sell ad space to. By the way what about the news wires? Ever read some of the news out, often adult stocks put their URL in the news release. In fact look at SNMM latest 3/4 report. Please if you are against adult then do not buy the stock. I see it as great value because the stock is already depressed due to its adult subsidiary, many brokers will not tell their older clients. When SNMM sells their adult, which they are working on this stock will really fly as the gates open up. What is very glaring is bateman has kept the thread to the top early Sunday. Trying to fish in responses. I quess he is the short on duty. I think this person has pre typed posts and just keeps posting and talking to himself. Is he stupid, no way. He is promoting the post. He is either a shorter ( using unethical tactics ) or an alias of Flo, and she has already showed us all her morals despite what her words say. The words of one poster " Floydie> Lets hear it for SI for standing up against filth on the internet and deleting the links to live sex acts of person that started this thread and allowed a link to live sex shows. Pardon me, Floydie, but didn't You start this thread and include the link to the naked ladies? Where do you think your credibility is now?" What we have is negative hyping by shorters. There are now 4 of them teaming up. Bear and Anthony showed within minutes of her posts, both self disclosed shorters. They will most likely say what's wrong with that. The timing tells all. My guess is most are not even short yet, just laying the ground work as they know this stock is going higher, and they know it will most likely get ahead of itself, and they know that if they post their crap then they can use it to make the correction deeper and make more money on the short side. There is nothing wrong with shorting stocks in my mind ( other then one tends to focus on negative ) it is their tactics that are slimy. They do the exact same as the paid hypsters. That is right, they are paid negative hypsters, they make money threw instilling fear and doubt. I normally just sit back and read. Your great post with FACTS and her negative games forced me out. Once again roofman thanks.