SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David M. Green who wrote (2295)3/14/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: LORD ERNIE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
 
I agree with Jack. If they are only three shorters who are posting, it will not be followed by many shareholders. The more there is posted the more shareholders want to look at this thread.
On other threads they know already that shorters are attacking SNNM
See below at =========================
To: hammer (2243 )
From: patwrk Sunday, Mar 14 1999 2:18AM ET
Reply # of 2244

Sorry to see Mark so disillusioned, considering how positive and insightful he was in January. My broker has just had a very extensive conversation with GGNC. I use a full-service broker (with a negotiated discount). This has allowed establishment of a relationship with two traders who prevent the mms from nailing me (saves far more than the commissions since I don't have time to sit in front of the computer and dole out shares). As important, my broker 'pays me back' by calling on my companies as a representative of a relatively large shareholder with direct questions.

I am now very satisfied as to where this company is and soon will be-actually almost as excited as I was in late November. Yes, there have been a few bumps--we're surprised by this with such a young company? Young fellas in the company got unexpectedly rich quick, sold shares and left, the company went through a brief P&D which burned a few investors, etc. But call as we did and ask what Chu has and is accomplishing right now, get your confirmation that Price etal. (yes, big eight) will indeed be performing the audit on way to fully reporting, ask about areas of business in addition to the far east venture that may produce even more revenue etc. I voted with my money by purchasing an additional 24,000 shares! I believe we received truthful answers--would be very unwise for company to lie, at this stage, to a major national brokerage!

To all who have lasted through the last few months, including visits

by the professional shorts such as A@P (now attacking SNMM's run with
======================================================================
an 'anti smut' campaign (yawn), real but corrected mistakes, etc., I believe that we will soon be rewarded.


DON'T PLAY THERE GAME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



To: David M. Green who wrote (2295)3/14/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: Jack Turner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
 
I do not suggest that we just let them trash. It is just that by posting to her thread what we do is put her thread to the top. I am not worried about being shaken out either and I do not believe serious short players are short the stock at these levels, most are not stupid. This stock is to strong and has not had a blow off. No, they are digging the trenches as they believe this will go higher and then the war will start. They are doing their DD now, SNMM showed up on their radar, as any moving OTC stock will.

I think there is a good shot the shorters will be very carefull shorting this baby. An internet stock in the fastest growing segment making money and recognized as a leader in what they do. That can be very ugly if you are short.

So nobody needs to panic just be aware. Add some threads so people can find other subjects about the stock. And check out ragingbull.com

My e-mail sent to Flo

To flodyie - truth seeker -
The truth about you is out.
Subject 26579

Regards - "rip you heart out with the truth"
When are you going to ask SI to delete the adult link and your descriptive adult words in YOUR post that you used to start your thread? After all you condemned them in that same post for allowing behavior such as yours being displayed in public forum. And do you really think people will not see your real motivates?

Do you also attack Yahoo, Excite, & Lycos?
P.S. See the post on your thread, what are you going to do about that? Appears techstocks.com is hosting hard core stuff, I am confused by it but do not know how that link works. Please cc me in your e-mail to SI regards this one as that is sometihng!
Message 8307780

Some comments on your thread, people who see your tactics.
Message 8307194

Any ways I am sure people will figure out your game and stop posting to your self serving thread and the shorters will have to carry the whole load. Not hard as you are a team.

You really are an unethical lot.

No I do not mind shorters at all. It is part of the game.
Regards adult, I believe that mature people have the right to decide for themselves. If they do not want to see adult content, then don't go. If they do not like adult content then do not invest in SNMM, many do not because of that. If they are really worried about children accessing it get Net Nanny, Cyber Cop or ten or so other software that does that. Hell there are even ISP's who will block for you.

It is clear to me that you are an unethical self serving person that is as bad or worse then hypsters you condemn.

I will rally a few of the mature level headed investors to make you work for every cent you make on the short side of SNMM by posting the truth about you and about SNMM.

P.S. Any responsible person who was concerned about the issues you raised would have done as I and others have and that is to send an e-mail to SNMM objecting to not having a warning page. So I think we will achieve the goal you claimed to of had.

By the way check this link ( do not go if you are offended by adult content ) Make sure you check who Yahoo sold the ad space to.
search.yahoo.com

P.S. I also own YHOO, so I guess in your mind I am a low life scum.

Was nice talking to you. If you wish you can respond by private e-mail ( I reserve the right to make it public ) or respond to any of my posts. I will not respond to you on that trashy tread you started.