SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (52607)3/14/1999 7:13:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575596
 
Re: "Doesn't this look like Intel is FULLY UTILIZING this fab?"

I never claimed that Intel wasn't fully utilizing the fab.

I do believe that Intel didn't really want the fab in the first place, and that DEC essentially "stuck it to 'em."

Kevin



To: Paul Engel who wrote (52607)3/14/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575596
 
Pwengle-yourself >If you get stuck with a fab you don't want as a result of ending up on the losing side of litigation, you might as well make some use out of it.>

Intel confirmed that when it first discovered the capacity issue it interrupted supplies to some customers

Sounds like an anti-trust situation to me. Were the 'interruptions' based on usage of other mp products? A simple question? Will you simply respond?

tgptndr


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News