Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scoobah who wrote (777)	3/15/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: Sid Turtlman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2513

Steve: That is nice of you to post information about Millenium Bridge, which "may have been the original name for Antaeus". Well, maybe it was, but maybe it wasn't. Is that an official assertion of DCHT, that Antaeus is the same company as Millenium Bridge, or are they not saying that? Why can't DCHT release the address of this supposed big customer, and its phone number, if it has either? It should also give out the name of at least one officer or director so those who want to see if this promised order is legit can speak with someone about it. Given that Matech has minimal equity and cash, and SIMS is a private company of unknown resources, some evidence that Antaeus is capable of giving big orders to DCHT would also be a good idea. BTW, Steve, you seem to take an antagonistic approach to my suggestions, but I think they are good ones designed to help DCHT, not harm it. What good does it do DCHT to be suspected of fraud, when if they follow my advice and release verifiable information, the whole matter can be cleared up in an instant? Also, good luck in your new stock posting site venture. Your desire to have posters be responsible is an admirable one. I am curious, though, as administrator of your new site, what would you do in this hypothetical circumstance: You discover that a poster using more than one alias (let's call them "Dr. Harvey" and "SirAlexx") is spaming the threads with research reports on a non-reporting penny stock purportedly written by someone else, but actually written by that poster. Moreover, you discover that the poster was actually paid a substantial amount of stock from the penny stock, as well as ongoing fees, and doesn't disclose that in his posts. Furthermore, the poster has his two aliases plus a second fellow, who was also given stock, (who we will call "Mr. Metals") have conversations back and forth, talking about how wonderful the penny stock is, without revealing their relationship to the company and each other. On top of that, the poster fills his posts with foul language and threats against anyone who disagrees with his promotion. In this hypothetical situation, what would an honest administrator such as yourself do? Kick the poster off? Report him to the SEC? Slap his wrist a bit? I am curious how a website whose focus is on integrity and responsibility would handle a matter like that. Thanks.