Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : SETO Semicon Tools Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rosemary who wrote (1727)	3/14/1999 7:17:00 PM
From: KZAP	Respond to of 3222

Everyone wants to show us how much they know. After the fact. LOL! KZAP

To: Rosemary who wrote (1727)	3/14/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: KZAP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3222

TO SOMEONE WHO IS A SAA MEMBER. WHO HAS PAID FOR THE ADVANCE INFORMATION. Please tell me when the "Buy" recommendation took place. I won't tell on you! :^) Promise! Use PM or EM! Thanks! Because, IF the SAA (paid) members were told SETO was a buy (again) before the large volume of last week, then it would appear that most SAA members did NOT even buy more SETO. IF that is the case, The SAA recommended "sell 30%" is (IMO) not warranted. That's just my opinion. Because the volume is just not there. Or the group didn't take advantage of the SAA recommendation. IMO The public SAA recommendation on March 10th, 1999, shows very little volume after that time. The real volume came Friday from the Stock-Pick group. KZAP

To: Rosemary who wrote (1727)	3/14/1999 7:53:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3222

We all have to do what is right for us and do it based on DD which includes FA & TA. SETO is going to do whatever it is going to do and I will trade based on what it is doing like I always do. Now if I paid SAA I would be ticked that SAA was posting publicly. Something is seriously wrong with this picture. If he really wanted his PAID members to make profit he would not have openly posted his sell on an open thread and kept to his newsletter. He wants it to fall obviously and his members to sell against selling which goes against every principal of investing I know. That seems like an OXYMORON to me. Only shorters caught do this type of tactic in my opinion and experience. I personally would have to seriously doubt the tactics of SAA. No wonder when they make a "buy" very little happens after two years. I wonder if they are selling into their "buy" or buying into their "sell" . But we will have to wait and see. I hate newsletters like this and these type tactics... This whole scenario STINKS and as far as Quick Picks' record vs SAA's I will track Quick Picks ... Gary