SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis - Beginners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Estes who wrote (9839)3/14/1999 11:24:00 PM
From: big run  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
Richard....is there a specific example in a chart you can point me to? I've been reading the Elliott Wave stuff and it gets pretty complex. I think I'm even starting to stutter these days.

I've read where Gann used time in his analysis, is that right? If so, with the 3 higher highs and higher lows is there anything with time in it? Also, is there any amount of movement required to verify a higher low in an uptrend? I mean, if a stock bases, breaks out and bases again with no significant retracement would this be considered a higher low?

Thanks
Mike



To: Richard Estes who wrote (9839)3/15/1999 12:09:00 AM
From: BreakOut  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
Richard, Good quick look way of seeing ST trend. That would put the Russell in an uptrend. I would welcome that, but i'm still not convinced. (but hopeful). Rut still needs power through 400. On the other hand break of 387 would sure look like lights out (a head and shoulder pattern to those who care about such things).

Oils seem to be getting off the mat. Played HEC RDC and GLM last week. looking for safe(r) reentry point.




To: Richard Estes who wrote (9839)3/15/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Dick Brown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12039
 
"The trend is considered to be in place until you have 3 periods of lower highs and lower lows"

Kind of goes against one of the Cooper scans..He looks to buy with 'similar' set of conditions.. Interesting, I never had much success with his 1,2,3,4's anyway..
Dick.