Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (52620)	3/14/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1575487

Re: "It is clear that INTC didn't choose to buy the fab. They paid for it as a result of theft of intellectual properties that was caught, a court decreed punishment for the wrongs they performed" More nonsense. This was an out of court settlement between the 2 parties. Intel picked up a fab, a StrongArm license, other product lines and an engineering staff. All for about $500 Million. Some might thing Intel stole one from DEC. EP

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (52620)	3/15/1999 2:14:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575487

Pwetnder - Re: "Should they demand alternate source for all X-86 chips?" Boy, you're really getting NERVOUS now that your AMD investment is $0.50 UNDER WATER ! You sure have bad luck in the CPU investment game - shorting Intel as it goes skyward and buying AMD while it continues to plummet ! A great contrarian indicator you are ! Please SHORT Intel again - we could use another $10 run up. By "we" I mean me an the other AMD die hards like Kevin and Jimbo McMannis - who also are Intel shareholders ! Paul