Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (38353)	3/15/1999 12:03:00 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Well said!!! But just as one life of one child should not be taken, so we too must leave vengence in the hands of the LIVING GOD. dan

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (38353)	3/15/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I think that Abraham Lincoln's objections to the actions of John Brown at Harper's Ferry, about the danger of flouting the rule of law, even in opposition to an unjust law, applies in the case of radical pro- life activities. However, that is mainly because there is hope of satisfaction through existing institutions---- changing the law is part of the rule of law too. In a dictatorship, such as the Nazi regime, and with an ever expanding list of horrors, armed resistance would be justified.

To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (38353)	3/15/1999 3:02:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

"in a “civilized” manner decide to allow the extermination of children by almost fully delivering them and puncturing the backs of their skulls and sucking out their brains."; These methods should only be allowed on severely deformed, etc. babies; babies that would be in terrible pain and die within a short period of time or is missing limbs, etc. This all sounds terrible if you picture a perfectly healthy baby, but this was SUPPOSED to be for screwed up babies. I guess life of the mother would require extracting the baby somehow out of the mother in a way that would save her life also. I can't imagine how you can make it pretty to describe the horrible sitation of killing a baby to save the mother, but it has to be done sometimes. Some medical situations are horrifying when described and most people outside of doctors and nurses don't have to see these things or know about them. If it was a healthy mother and a healthy baby; even if it was from rape or incest; at the point it is already viable; it is killing. I don't call it murder; since it isn't established as that. It would be totally wrong. But what say you to the babies that have no brain or missing internal organs?