Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (2339)	3/15/1999 12:29:00 AM
From: Roofman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

More SNMM FACTS. Posted on RB: By: yorktown Reply To #9505 by Trifecta Sunday, 14 Mar 1999 at 10:34 PM EST Post # of 9658 IGBE Show - Talked with Dholen!!! I was at the show on Friday in Vegas. The show was for the most part tiny. Starnet has 2-4 other competitors that liscence technology. The biggest competitor was BOSSMEDIA, that charges a whopping $500K up front to start up an on-line casino. Because of this, Starnet rakes in more liscencees over a shorter period of time, requesting 50K up front and a %age of the take. The other competitors are fairly new and small (GrandVirtual was one of them: a bunch of MIT kids from Boston). One had zero (0) liscencees. If you got money to start a biz, an online casino is the way to go. Starnet's liscencees put out $250-500K to start the site, with a return on investment in 3 - 9 months (most within 6 months). One guy is raking in over $1 mil in revenues/month. Dholen: I was very impressed. The guy is charismatic, very energetic and knowledgable about the biz. I was concerned with the server being in Anitigua: If a big wind (hurricane) comes by July-Oct and knocks the roof off of the building, knocking out the power & shuitting the server, then SNMM was in trouble, right? Wrong! They put a bakcup in St. Kitts and plan to have another in another geographic region of the world. Also, the server in Antiugua is in a building built by a major cable & telecom co (forgot the name) and was built to withstand hurricanes. They also have generators in the building. Takeover: No CHANCE. Math of shares (below) prevent it and a poison pill clause is written in the company by-laws. Shares: This was WRITTEN down to me by Dholen: Owners : ~10 million (as a single block) Options : 2.5 million to employee Warrants : 2 million ($2 before 12/31/99 for employees) Warrants : 2.5 million ($4 before 12/31/99 for employees) Float : 13 million ------------------------------------------------- Total shares: 30 million As for what's going on: Another major sports figure is going to be announced as a liscencee. Sexsites will be sold soon. Starnet is way ahead of their sales forecasts on liscencees. ANOTHER MAJOR POINT: UBET is screwed!!!! I was told one of Starnets liscencee's registered www.ubet.com as his URL (which is now a casino STARNET gets revenue on and not UBET)!!!! In order for U-BETs gamblers to bet, they have to type www.you-bet.com - (based on this...UBETs STOCK should CRASH soon) Languages: Starnet offers the casino in 7 different languages. 2 more are coming (including HEBREW). NYC Visit: If you're not an analyst or major stock firm, forget about going. The room is overbooked and Dholen wants these guys ears only. Basically, the goal is to tell the Starnet "Story" about how it started, where it is and where its going. The company is not looking for cash. Once he's got their attention, he expects the stock "to have a zero at the end of the number." After seeing them, talking with their competitors, and getting a feel for the whole business, I'm more than convinced this stock is WAY undervalued. Net gambling may be banned in the US soon, but it is here to stay in the world.

To: StockDung who wrote (2339)	3/15/1999 8:16:00 AM
From: Gator	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8858

Floydie, Thanks for the link...Now,Baryzl post at RB: The SHORTS over at SI "I spent an hour or so going threw. There are three main players. flodyie, Bear Down, Anthony@Pacific All are known shorts and they say so and I have no problem with that. In fact I plan to follow Bear and Anthony for Education reasons as they are good at what they do. I found one post where Bear Down tells Anthony that he shorted SNMM, the post was 9 Mar 11:09 and SNMM would have been a max price of $7 1/8, that was the day we had a strong close to $7 1/2. Don't get me wrong I do not think that a good move. What I mean is there are stocks out there that should be shorted and that is there game. Both Bear Down and Anthony are what I call prof short players and are RUTHLESS. They are in the same game as the hypsters but on the opposite end. I.E. the hypsters dig and find the good and can tend to blow it up, they will never point out problems or weakness. The shorts do the opposite buy finding or tring to find negative and blowing it up and ones with morals will just stretch the negative but not lie or make things up. HOWEVER it is clear these three are intellegent and DO co-ord there efforts. Look at the THREAD started by flodyie so it comes up whenever somebody puts in SNMM. This person starts a thread complaining about the fact that a post at SI has the link to SNMM adult site and then uses adult words and provides the link to SNMM Canada's adult site. So now I see SI did remove the links from the thread started and achieved her so called goal that she boosts about. By the way what about the search engines. I guess she will also need to go after Yahoo, Excite, Lycos and all the rest. HOWEVER now her post would need to be edited to undo the damage she just did by her actions. All this with her motive of protecting kids. Do you think she cares, NO, she only cares about displaying the so called NEGATIVE about a company SNMM owns. Well she is so full of it and totally dishonest. She is a short and planned the whole thing. That will keep coming up as people respond to it. It will be interesting if she picks up on that or complains to SI to edit her post. She says she is not short, someone said she said she was. Does not matter, I suggest she will short when SNMM goes higher then her posts works for her and the three of them and any other short just keep bring it up. Then look at the thread. In a flash Bear Down and Anthony jump in, I mean within minutes. All three are short players and that is fine with me. What is evil is there methods ( so are hypster methods self serving and evil ). They are not happy with just shorting they want to increase their gains threw actionsa like that. That post was done for one purpose. So the POST will come up when people go to look into SNMM. I suggest that to combat this there is only one thing to do. 1. Do not ever respond to the string she started. Suggest the same to other posters at SI. Ref this post if you want. Then only the shorters will be responding and there circle jerk will be clear to the longs. 2. Start a couple threads and interact with each other as they do. That way you will have some positve headers come up. After all we are talking about a company with at least 90% positive so lets have 90% of the headers positve. ( I looked up Bear always sending posts to Anthony. He sends those SO people can SEE and he can referance to) I declare only one of the shorters as a self serving dishonest and misleading unethicial person. That is flodyie with her post doing exactly what she condeemed. Talk about two faced. All I can say is this. It is fine to spread news. It is fine post negative or positve about a stock. What I do not agree with is the dishonesty used to increase your gains at the expense of others. Yes we all make our own decissions and we are responsiable for them. I am talking about purposefull deception. I do not know if I will actually sign up at SI to post. I find I already spend to much time here. I enjoy the interaction here and do not want to put in more time over there.I see some of you over their, like roofman. Suggest you start some threads and interact. Things like - SNMM longs don't allow the SHORTS to eat your lunch Then talk about some of the things I just mentioned. Talk about some of the FACTS issued by SNMM Other suggestions - SNMM the Microsoft of Internet Gaming software Start talking about the software, the quotes from forbs, ask others for feedback, any other better software out there. Get it going - SNMM or CRY.TO which will lead the way Two great companies to compare, the only real players putting software out there. - SNMM - Who will be the next Celb to endorse We have two now. Start a string. Bet with the champ. - SNMM Gaming Internet stock MAKING money Start comparing it to other Internet companies. I am going to watch SI over the next week. I will be looking for the new headers. I will set up an account and join in if people show interest. I do not have the time to lead this one. Any leaders out there? What have you done for your stock lately? By the way if I do start over at SI it will not be as baryz Good luck and lets defuse these nasty ruthless short games. ALWAYS ALWAYS remain level headed. Your anger will feed rigth into there hand. Go look at their posts, study their psych game. Do not get yourself psyched out." >> Later...Gator