Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john t. brice who wrote (9369)	3/15/1999 3:17:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I don't think Wexler believes any of his own statements. He's here for one reason, to save his own ass by trying to talk the stock down. If you're long, hold your position, you'll be rewarded.

To: john t. brice who wrote (9369)	3/15/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

<<FMK has been vindicated at least as far as being correct that VLNC is in the game with future mars probes. It would seem that he is right on nearly everything concerning VLNC except the timing and even that may be starting to fall his way.>> Let's see now. "Valence batteries are going to Mars!" is vindicated by Alliant/VLNC presenting a technical paper. And "My source is taking delivery of 100,000 shares, this will cause a big price increase!" is vindicated by an alleged drop in the options open interest of 80,000 shares. Your standard of vindication is pretty low, IMO, duckster. Can you point to a single prediction by Fred or his sources over the last two years that has been proven to be 100% correct? I'd like to see it. As you know, I can point to dozens that have been proven to be incorrect.