SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ramsey Su who wrote (8299)3/15/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: Bosco  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9980
 
Hi Ramsey, glad you got a laugh out of it <g>. Actually, my point was more than skin deep [um, soil deep <vbg>.] Instead of enunicating the obscure - and outdated - system of levy, my point was there is nothing new under the sun and all things come in cycles [apt for SI <g>?!] Those who learn to execute the strategy in the right place and time will be the heroes of the day. My sister, a Chinese history and economics teacher, told me that Mao learned all his skills from the "Ambition of the Tri-kingdom." If so, his holding to power was more than sheer luck or pure charisma. If we are to believe the new crop of Chinese leaders like Zhu who are beyond just a bunch of autocrats supported by the military, they will understand the genie is out of the bottle and they have to employ the best strategy. People like Zhu may not have read "Anatomy of A Revolution" or "The True Believer," but they understand human nature and mass movement intuitively, so long as they won't go off the the deep end.

You sez, "Those who has been critical of the human rights records of the CURRENT Chinese regime have demonstrated, by their posts, that they have no interest in facts anyway."

IMHO, I see it very differently. For the record, I too am critical of the human rights record of the CURRENT Chinese regime, but no only I am interested in the fact of what has been and what is, but also I am interested in the possibility of what can be. Unless we have open dialogues, no meaningful exchange is possible. It is important to emphasize the pronoun 'we'. It takes two to tango, a close minded defender is no better than a close minded attacker.

Btw, personally, I do not think I know too much of Chinese history, there are several people in this thread are knowledge experts in China to the point of being a sinologist <g>. Heck, Mira Sarvina probably speaks better mandarin than I can ever

best, Bosco