Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike from La. who wrote (40035)	3/15/1999 4:43:00 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Mike, RIG's announcement re. taxing capital gains is ambiguous, but it looks like it says that if I have a paper gain on RIG, which I do from buying at the recent bottom, then I will be forced to recognize that gain for tax purposes this year even if I don't sell my RIG stock. That's what I don't like. Did you come away with a different interpretation of this?

To: Mike from La. who wrote (40035)	3/15/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: A. Fineigler	Respond to of 95453

Mike, The key question is, does your cost basis change if you currently do not have a paper profit on RIG when the reorg hits ? I.E. if you paid $30/share and RIG costs $25 the day of the issuance of new shares, will your cost be adjusted to $25/share for the new shares ? If your cost is adjusted at time of reorg to match the new shares price, and you currently have a loss on your hands, it might be worth considering selling now and buying back later in order to realize the loss. The risk, of course, is that the stock price would go up during the (30-day ?) wash rule period. Also, if you have a mixture of profitable and loss-laden RIG, it might be worth selling just to simplify your tax situation. But the risk of the stock running up after you sell is always there, of course. AF

To: Mike from La. who wrote (40035)	3/15/1999 4:57:00 PM
From: Mike from La.	Respond to of 95453

9:30 am Eastern Time SOURCE: World Energy U.S. Senate Considers Bill to Maintain 20% of U.S. Production; Bill Will Help Maintain Production in America's Marginal Wells, According to an Article in World Energy Magazine HOUSTON, March 15 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was released today by World Energy magazine: The Bill is called ''U.S. Energy Economic Growth Act'' and with crude oil prices at their lowest point in decades, thousands of marginal producing wells are in peril of being shut down, with that potential domestic production lost forever. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, (R-Tex) has introduced the U.S. Energy Economic Act to protect the half-million stripper wells that produce close to 20 percent of America's oil. ''A safety net in the form of a tax credit can offset the cost of keeping marginal wells operating at a time of low prices, and preserve hundreds of thousands of wells and thousands of U.S. jobs,'' Hutchison writes in the spring 1999 issue of World Energy magazine. (Copies are available at the WWW.WorldEnergySource.com) Hutchison also called for the U.S. to begin purchasing U.S. crude to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a program that is now underway. Hutchison's bill also seeks to restart inactive wells by offering producers a tax exemption for the costs of doing so. ''This would increase revenues paid by oil producers to the federal government,'' she notes, by increasing oil production that would be taxable and by increasing taxable job earnings. As she explains in her article, there are already 17 bipartisan co- sponsors of the bill, and the Congressional Oil and Gas Caucus is urging Congress to take swift action. Also in this issue, Peter Beadle tells how his company, BP Solar, views the future of solar-powered electricity, while former Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher explains why the administration must engage Venezuela's new president, former rebel Hugo Chavez. World Energy publishes thought-provoking articles written by the heads of energy companies and other industry leaders worldwide. In this way, the magazine delivers an unfiltered view of what energy leaders are concerned with today -- and tomorrow. World Energy is published by International Business Publishers, Inc., which also produces worldenergysource.com, a website that carries World Energy's content and more. ---- Looks like the OPEC action will probably take the steam out of things like this. My guess is the many Congresspersons will say, "let's just wait a bit and see what oil prices do, before we start screwing with tax laws." I wonder if OPEC took into account that low oil prices could cause some from for Government subsidies to protect their home oil industry? That would cause exporting countries to compete with companies getting Government aid, lowering oil prices still more. Maybe OPEC saw this sort of thing happening, and decided they've pushed the attack on higher cost producers as far as they could without causing a destructive backlash. Mike