Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EFAX.com - easy-to-use fax-to-email technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Hua who wrote (398)	3/15/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1197

Tom, accept your thoughts, with the exception that SKYM was different. Hadn't be that the stock where one insider sold shares @40 to reap the majority via options exercise @7 from the other directors? I see that it went up that far, that it was quite unhealty. C.

To: Tom Hua who wrote (398)	3/15/1999 7:45:00 PM
From: Lance	Respond to of 1197

TOM- I agree, just look at the monthly chart. This stock will fall, but I'm sure we'll see a serious gappo tomorrow am, with a serious & very fierce downward fall. Everyone knows this stock was just in the $4 range, people will take profits and the news will vanish & we'll see a nice downward drift. I love the fact that the insiders have sold, that right there is the biggest key! Looking forward to a very profitable day, sooner than later...:) Lance

To: Tom Hua who wrote (398)	3/15/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Jon Stept	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1197

Tom, re: "engineering their selling today..." Hi Tom, If this company can engineer their own price increases with news releases, wouldn't that be a good reason to stay with the company? Also, when do you think an insider should sell their stock... when the price is down? At a time when no news is released? So far, no lies. No holding back information. (See recent Compaq lawsuit). I don't get the impression that they are trying to get out their money before the stock tanks. For the measley number of shrares they sold, I don't think they would risk their reputation and credibility. Fifty million dollars would get my attention, but not 5 million between 7 guys. That is peanuts. I don't see any unusual story here. Jon :)