Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Angel D who wrote (54206)	3/15/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>>> I brought this up last year when I was having an exchange with "s" and MK PM'd me, picking up the conversation without losing a beat.<<<<< That only means at most that he (Mike) must have been reading the exchange. Why would it indicate he was using Martin's account? It doesn't rule it out but certainly is not an indication of your claim. TG

To: Angel D who wrote (54206)	3/15/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>> It's actually quite easy to confuse "s" for "Kugiebuns", as Mike often uses s martin's account to post. I brought this up last year when I was having an exchange with "s" and MK PM'd me, picking up the conversation without losing a beat. It was quite obvious who was using the account that day. I know, and I know that Ellen knows, that they are two separate persons. However, we just don't know who's posting on the account on any given day.<< Now there's some sound reasoning. NOT. According to you, you and I were having a "conversation" on the thread and MK PMed you and that proves he is using my account??????????????????????????? Would you please inform the thread how two people can use the same account at the same time? I presume the PM you received came with the name Mike Kugler attached to it ? For your information Mike Kugler has never used my account nor have I used his. Even if I wanted to I wouldn't know how, nor do I know how he would use mine, we'd have to get the answer on how that is done from Pugs who uses everyone's account to post. >>Once again, there is no point for me in reading this thread. I will have to rely on the e-mail thread for any information. Thanks a lot!! Get it? Thanks a hellufa lot! Because you folks think it is so cute to trash this thread, we are only left with the e-mail thread. Is that what you want? It isn't what many of you have stated.<< This thread had been inactive for months until Riley decided he needed to come forth with public denials of his role in this scam. Why not take your dirty linen to the E-Mail thread and stay there with it ? If you think Riley is going to post publically what we all know is not true and we are going to sit here and not correct that then you forgotten what the purpose of the nays is. Riley is simply making another grandstand bid for attention and we all know that. .>> Even tonto has given up on this thread, and that's a damned shame. Please pardon my language.<< Tonto offered information to Riley, which Riley claimed was a part of his own efforts to get to the bottom of the matter. Riley then indicates the information was obtained through illegal means, which is as good as saying tonto either committed a burglary or was in receipt of stolen material. Pugs jumps on the bandwagon by bringing up the GIFS burglary. Why would tonto want to bother posting here ?

To: Angel D who wrote (54206)	3/16/1999 7:57:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<< It's actually quite easy to confuse "s" for "Kugiebuns", as Mike often uses s martin's account to post. I brought this up last year when I was having an exchange with "s" and MK PM'd me, picking up the conversation without losing a beat. It was quite obvious who was using the account that day. I know, and I know that Ellen knows, that they are two separate persons. However, we just don't know who's posting on the account on any given day.>> Eh? Judge Judy will be back with her ruling in a moment... I wanted to commend you, s martin, Tideglider, Top Cat, Matty, Zonkie (whoever the heck he is), et. al., for the way you have taken over this thread. Logic sways the opinions of many... especially online. Loyalty is dying, and logic is becoming the primary doctrine, which is what it should be in a stock forum. Remember: the true loyalty stems from the appeal to either the person's logic or passions. The outcome is the only way to determine the winner. In this case, logic won. Plain and simple, Angel. And logic will continue to keep passions in check by pointing out faults in its logic. <<However, I think it's pathetic the way you insult Ellen. You really show what you are made of.>> You left out Ulrich, Shell, and the entire AZNT contingent of people. There are a few more out there, I'm sure. We just can't believe that people choose to leave their logic in their other suits like Ellen does. Why don't you quit being so goddamn nasty and try to be constructive? Angel, refer to your first paragraph in your message to us. Now, was that really constructive? Nnnnnaaaaaaaaaaah. C'mon, man. MG.