SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : INFE ... Infocall another Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Theo who wrote (9886)3/15/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Major Tom  Respond to of 10343
 
I can see different perspectives on this stock. I feel them both I got in high around $4 and kept adding each time it dropped in half and then continued to periodically added from .43 to .65, selling some on the bumps up, and buying when back down, and sold some today on the big bump up but still kept the majority. Don't know if it's a pump or not but if it dumps back down I will be there to buy more, simply because I believe in the company long term.
Major Tom Smiling today.



To: Theo who wrote (9886)3/15/1999 10:22:00 PM
From: Little Engine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10343
 
Yes... if I were a shorter, I'd certainly look for a 50 cent, low-float, non-marginable and easily manipulated stock... I got a chuckle from that though.

Reminded me of the Rocketeer days here. "Head fake!" "We control the float!" "Evil shorting conspiracy!" LOL.

Yes, I was stupid advising anyone (one poster to this board via PM)to sell at $4. Mea culpa.

I'll agree that the hype is coming not from the thread but from the outside -- spam and mail promotion -- but INFE was hype-driven today just the same. Unless there was news that I missed today.

Doesn't the anonymous mail bombing from the Czech Republic give you pause... the inventing of another "analyst" like we saw in the National Capital PR?

Wouldn't it be easier and more constructive to just release the audit? Do you think they are even working on it?

If it is true that the Useltons have a monthly contract for promoting INFE... gee, they might want to take credit for a one-day run as "proof of their success".... don't you think? It came so conveniently after their mailing.



To: Theo who wrote (9886)3/16/1999 7:36:00 AM
From: The Street  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10343
 
Maybe National Capital ran it up to short it since they "lost" their contract.

Anyone have the MM line-up?