SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: exhon2004 who wrote (76393)3/15/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: Neal davidson  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 186894
 
Thread: A rather negative article from thestreet.com. I wonder if Cramer shorts a stock right before he publishes crap like this.

TECH STOCKS >> SEMICONDUCTORS

For Intel's Fast P3 Chip, Customer
Appeal Spreads Slowly
By Marcy Burstiner
Staff Reporter
03/15/99 09:00 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- Intel (INTC:Nasdaq) is spending $300
million to promote the new, high-powered Pentium III chip,
twice as much as the company has ever spent on marketing
any new product group. Yet despite the big bankroll, the
premium chip's big splash is turning into something more
like a trickle.

Intel may have won the support of hundreds of developers for
its Pentium III chip, but interest from customers seems to be
won at a price -- a low one. To stave off competition from rival
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD:NYSE), Intel had
announced severe price cuts on all its chips except for the
P3. But in the market, P3 machines are appearing at bargain
prices. That might disturb investors, since traditionally Intel's
newest chips have carried the highest sales prices and profit
margins.

To hook consumers and developers, Cahners In-Stat
Group analyst Max Baron says, Intel may be sacrificing
margins -- temporarily at least -- on the P3. Computown is
now advertising a full P3-powered desktop computer for
$999. At that price, Intel has got to be selling the P3 for
close to the price of the P2, he says.

The perception is clear in the marketplace. Bruce
Duttenhofer of Marietta, Ga.-based Flexible Products, said
the only reason he is updating his company's desktops with
the P3 is because he found it at close to the cost of the P2.

"Why not?" Duttenhofer asks. "I am purchasing new
machines with the P3, but that doesn't mean I endorse it or
think it's better. We haven't put it through its paces yet."
Other managers were even less enthusiastic. Three said
they knew little about the P3, while two said they had looked
at the chip and decided that the older Pentium II was a
better value.

"The P2 is working fine, along with some of the older
Pentiums," says Larry Urick, director of information
technology at Indianapolis-based Pictorial. "There did not
seem to be a significant performance difference with the P3.
I'm not looking to replace equipment with it at this time. I
don't see any features there that would make me want to
pay the premium price."

This ambivalence about PC chips is also reflected in Intel's
stock price. After the company first unveiled the chip to great
fanfare Feb. 17, the stock climbed about 8% over the next
five days. Since then, however, it has dropped 12%.

Reservations about the chip are due to its somewhat
nebulous place in the technology spectrum. Some analysts
say the P3 isn't a true next-generation product. Nathan
Brookwood, an analyst with Insight 64, says that with a top
speed of 550 MHz, it's better described as a half-generation
ahead of the P2's 450 MHz.

And while the P3 includes new technology that speeds
Internet use, that level of improvement won't be noticeable to
the average user, Brookwood says. Even speeds of 500 MHz
and 550 MHz aren't enough of an improvement to justify the
official price of the chip, which is a $220 increase over the
P2's $476 price tag.

Brookwood expects the current P3 to languish until Intel
produces the 600 MHz P3, code name Coppermine, later
this year. "At 600 MHz, you'll notice the difference," he
says.

An Intel spokesman says that it's hard to gauge how well the
P3 is selling currently. "It's too early in the product's life
cycle," he says, adding that Intel has no plans to speed up
introduction of Coppermine.

Another issue has drawn analysts' concern. CIBC
Oppenheimer analyst Ken Pearlman says Intel's strategy
behind the P3 puzzles him. Intel has focused on Internet
capability, but the P3 is priced for high-end users and
business customers. People who buy computers purely for
the Internet often go to low-priced models, so the Internet
capabilities would have made more sense on the Celeron
chip that Intel makes for low-cost PCs. Oppenheimer is not
an underwriter for Intel.

For the past year, AMD has been selling its 3D Now! chip,
which offers the same Internet streaming capability as the
P3. AMD has already sold 8.5 million 3D Now! chips,
establishing a strong platform for developers. "AMD has 12
very large companies that write games for 3D Now!," says
Baron of Cahners In-Stat Group.

Some analysts have given up on the P3 altogether as a
driver of Intel's revenue and profit growth. S.G. Cowen
analyst Drew Peck is waiting instead for the Xeon processor
for servers that Intel will launch this week. "And that's a new
product we know nothing about," Peck said. Cowen is not an
underwriter of Intel.

Peck's fear is that business customers will show the same
level of excitement for the Xeon that Steve Lowe, director of
computing and information services at Aurora University in
Illinois, is showing for the P3.

Lowe maintains and upgrades a network of 250 computers
on the campus. "We are constantly upgrading. But for now
we are staying with the P2," Lowe says. "For the average
user the P2 is fine."

TOP

GET STOCK QUOTES

Symbol Name




TALK TO US
Send your feedback
and comments to
letters.

Check out reader
letters here.

TECH STOCKS
ARCHIVE
Read past stories.

SEND US FEEDBACK



Send your feedback to letters@thestreet.com.


© 1999 TheStreet.com, All Rights Reserved.

HOME
TSC NOW
MARKETS
STOCK NEWS
TECH STOCKS
FUNDS/TAXES
COMMENT



To: exhon2004 who wrote (76393)3/15/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Greg,

There's a difference between having vision and having visions. Jerry has demonstrated that he suffers from the latter.

I'm having visions of a 600 MHz K7 at Ce-Bit next week.

Scumbria