SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blankmind who wrote (2705)3/16/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Secret_Agent_Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30916
 
\%/+\%/+\%/+\#/+\$/, the last drink is Mine..SERIOUS POST below>>>>>

The battle of voice over ip heats up....

IDT's Net2Phone Direct Survives Real-World Labs® Live Tests
IDT's Net2Phone Direct service illustrates the state of IP telephony services, with
respectable but not perfect quality. Net2Phone Direct provides phone-to-phone calling--no IP
packets actually pass into customer sites. The service converts audio into packets at the
nearest IDT POP (point of presence), and then uses IDT's private IP backbone to route calls,
much like a traditional long-distance interexchange carrier uses its own circuit switches. With
75 POPs worldwide, IDT has a larger footprint than most IP telephony providers. The service
offers dramatically reduced rates, often around 10 cents a minute for calls anywhere in the
world.
At the ComNet show in Washington this past January, Network Computing unveiled
Real-World Labs® Live, where we conducted voice-over-IP demonstrations and tested IDT's
international long-distance calling service. In the tests, participants ranked the quality of
Net2Phone Direct compared with a standard AT&T toll call. We followed guidelines for
ranking comparative speech quality as detailed in the ITU-T P.800 specification, using a
five-point scale and generating mean opinion scores (MOSC in P.800 terminology).

In the first test, 34 participants held conversations with the London offices of Network Week
using the IDT service. Testers also placed a call using AT&T's long-distance service, which
served as a quality reference. Participants in Washington ranked each call as "bad," "poor,"
"fair," "good" or "excellent," to which we later assigned the numbers 1 through 5,
respectively.

As expected, the AT&T scores were quite high, with 62 percent of responses favoring the
more expensive service. But it's nonetheless surprising that Net2Phone Direct was rated the
same or better by 38 percent of the respondents. AT&T's average, on a five-point scale, was
4.40, relative to IDT's 3.70, a gap that is not as wide as AT&T would like you to believe. (See
chart to the right.)

Another group of participants ranked the audio quality of calls to labs located at the
Straslund Academy in Straslund, Germany, a partner to our sister publication, Network
Computing in Germany. Fifty-nine testers listened to live audio samples played during calls
via IDT and AT&T, using the same ranking system as the U.K. conversation test. This time,
IDT's ranking was even closer to AT&T's: It achieved a 3.69 rating compared with AT&T's
4.10. (See the chart to the right.)

The closer ranking in the listening-only test illustrates an important point about voice-over-IP
quality. In an actual call, long delays impede the ability to converse. Callers may notice a gap
between the time they stop speaking and when they start to hear the other party's response.
But delays aren't noticed upon listening to an audio sample. Instead, packet loss is the most
important factor, where "choppiness" and unnatural tone quality can annoy the listener. The
good ranking indicates that IDT's backbone isn't dropping packets, but the lower scores in
conversation tests point to latency as an occasional problem.

Although the quality is close to a traditional carrier's--but not quite as good--the toll savings
are phenomenal. All our calls ran only 10 cents per minute, compared with AT&T's peak
business rates of $1.90 a minute to Germany and $1.58 to the United Kingdom. And even
though IDT had to route traffic for the German calls to its London POP (a German location
was not yet available), there was no additional surcharge for the U.K.-to-Germany link.

btw, i AM GOING TO CHANGE MY GUESS ON WHO THE MEDIA CONGLOMERATE TO PLAIN i DON'T KNOW.....

CHEERS



To: blankmind who wrote (2705)3/16/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Hawaii60  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30916
 
3/18 earliest

3/22 latest



To: blankmind who wrote (2705)3/16/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: dlarson5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30916
 
Consent News- 3/22/99



To: blankmind who wrote (2705)3/18/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: Bill Zeman  Respond to of 30916
 
Blank

Put me down for Monday 3/22 b4 market.

Bill Zeman
(16 11/16)