Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael M who wrote (8304)	3/16/1999 7:18:00 AM
From: HRP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10072

<<If you are "sure" Herb would report bullish comments from other sources, if he heard any; you are either a simpleton or a liar. That is a fact - if it also qualifies as a personal attack, so be it. >> Michael M I agree that Herb is, in effect, a funnel for the arguments of shorts who appear to have his complete attention. I also agree that your remarks constitute as a personal attack - but upon yourself. hrp

To: Michael M who wrote (8304)	3/21/1999 10:43:00 PM
From: Dakota Sullivan	Respond to of 10072

michael, you seem a little angry about this. believe me, i'm not happy with iom either. i've averaged down and own about 5k shares now. but you noticed that greenberg posted iom's response to his article without disparaging comment? i'm not saying the guy's not taking unfair shots at iom-he is, no question. and i agree that he's put a negative spin on every announcement out of iom/iomg in the past 3 years. but in his defense, he has turned over a couple rocks where, if we paid attention, we wouldn't be holding the stock at 5.