Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (38733)	3/16/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 67261

ian, I tried to recreate my actions. I had been surfing and posting for a long time, and was somewhat punchy. I checked out the NYT website, but came up empty, then was directed to the Northern Lights search engine. I got numerous search results, and looked at a few things quickly, then found the relevant page. I posted it without looking around the site. When Doe asked, I think I simply got confused, having reviewed so many descriptions in the search results, and gone to a few pages, and replied thinking that I recalled something from the description that would justify my characterization. When later asked what EP designated, I was blank, and returned to poke around the site to find out. To my chagrin, it was a pro- life site, which I immediately posted on the thread. As I said, there was nothing that materially affected my point, which is why I posted the URL for the Gallup site, but not the other. I just thought it was interesting on the point of variable responses depending upon how the questions are framed, and it was a summary of an NYT article that I thought I had seen other references to elsewhere, or might have even read when I used to subscribe to the NYT. I post this follow- up because I couldn't remember why I had the impression it was a pro- choice site, so I tried to figure it out...