Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David who wrote (12738)	3/16/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: R. Jaynes	Respond to of 26039

David, Here's a letter from the IBIA site which is along the same lines - November 18, 1998 Mr. Eric Fredell Task Force on Electronic Commerce International Trade Administration Department of Commerce 14th & Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20230 Dear Mr. Fredell: This is in response to Mr. David Aaron's notice of November 12, 1998, describing the proposed International Safe Harbor Privacy Principles. As the trade association for the biometric industry, the IBIA has reviewed the proposal and offers comments on behalf of its member companies. The biometric industry is relatively new, and it is only in the past few years that its products have been in common use. The industry produces devices and software that automatically verify or identify an individual by unique physical characteristics. Examples include products that use face, iris, hand, fingerprint, and voice measurements in environments such as border control, information security, physical access control, financial transactions, time and attendance, law enforcement, and other civil and government applications. In most of the applications biometric technology is used to erect a barrier between personal data and unauthorized access. Often this is done by creating electronic templates that are used to perform the verification process. The templates normally use proprietary and carefully guarded algorithms to secure a record and protect it from disclosure. Standing alone, these templates are of no use and therefore do not appear to meet the definition of "personally identifiable data." Despite this important distinction, the industry is acutely aware of both the general perceptions that are created through the collection of any electronic information and the specific role that biometrics play in linking an individual to sensitive data. Companies understand that without a clear public stance on the issue of privacy, the industry faces serious obstacles in trying to achieve broad public acceptance of the technologies and thereby expand markets for its products here and abroad. As a first step in addressing this situation, IBIA members have established a strict Code of Ethics that obligates them to protect individual privacy and prevent unauthorized disclosure of information. In addition to demonstrating voluntary compliance, the industry recognizes the need for, and generally supports, the proposed Safe Harbor Principles. It is crucial, however, that government negotiators be aware of the protections that biometric technologies offer, and resist agreements that would constrict the use of biometric data to preserve personal data. We therefore strongly encourage the Department of Commerce to be sensitive to the unique status of biometrics when conducting negotiations with the European Union and other countries. To promote a better understanding of the industry and learn more about the issues faced by the Department, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and other appropriate officials who are involved in data privacy matters. I will contact you shortly to arrange such a session. Sincerely, Richard E. Norton Executive Director