SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (52185)3/16/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: re3  Respond to of 132070
 
Gravol's good for tummie problems...

Howard



To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (52185)3/16/1999 1:23:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
Re: Goldman Sachs

I was looking into opening an account with Goldman Sachs.
They gave me one of their many VP's to handle the account.
Their rates per transaction were 4-5X what I am accustomed to paying. But he told me that I could make up for it on better executions (an unverifiable assertion). He also told me that that is my rate was the same rate that their biggest customers paid. (a big lie) He said that I would not regret it if I opened and account. They also have no internet access to speak of.

Upon reflection, I decided to not open an account with this firm
despite its enviable reputation on WS. This VP probably graduated from an IVY league school and reminded me of used call salesmen.
But he inspired no confidence and was strictly unprofessional.

This firm is too fat and out of touch with the times.

JMO

JK




To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (52185)3/16/1999 2:42:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Wayne, Two thoughts come to mind: 1. If the smartest firm on Wall Street wants to sell out to suckers, what do they see coming? 2. The last time they wanted to sell, we had that little summer swoon.

MB